Dec
10
Defining pattens in Photoshop can be very useful, if you want to use patterns of your own. Defining patterns is actually quite easy and doesn’t take long. I have found patterns to be great space fillers mainly for website backgrounds, banners or even buttons..

Here’s a list of steps to define a pattern:
- Make a new canvas by going File >> New
- Make the canvas size 6×6, it can be any height, depending on the pattern you want to make
- Now zoom in as far as possible

- Time to do some pixel art, remember the pattern needs to be able to repeat, so make it semetrical
- Here is my pattern, simple, but effective

- Now to define it. Simply goto the top menu >> Edit >> Define Pattern then in the popup box give it a name:

- Thats it! Now you can access and use your pattern in the layer styles (double click a layer) layer style:

Here is an example of my pattern, with a background color and the opacity changed etc..

Hope this help a few of you guys out =]
Sorry about not posting for a week or so, i got distracted because of a web hosting site i am developing.. i should be back to blogging as normal now ![]()
This entry was posted
on Monday, December 10th, 2007 at 6:34 pm and is filed under - How To's, Photoshop.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.















April 6th, 2008 at 11:42 am
What kind of stuff are you talking about? I didn’t get a word of it! I’ve never understood people, who spend their time on commenting stuff like that.
April 9th, 2008 at 5:16 am
When you don’t have a clue on the topic, don’t even try to write anything! First find out what people are talking about, and then write what you think!!!
April 24th, 2008 at 8:01 am
audi so”
nnvnvnvufyyyfhfnCCvnvnvnvjffFDDDflvlvllvCCVvvmvmvmCCC
June 5th, 2008 at 10:11 am
Good post …. but I have a better approach up my sleeve …. I can share if anyone is interested ?
June 27th, 2008 at 3:31 am
I read similar article also named How to make/define patterns in photoshop, and it was completely different. Personally, I agree with you more, because this article makes a little bit more sense for me